[Gvvg561]

Yes, I know many believe that content is the King of SEO but it is not.

For SEO purposes is Content more important than the Page Title?

For SEO purposes is Content more important than the Header Tag?

For SEO purposes is Content more important than putting the your primary keyword phrase in the domain name?

Or what about this does anyone actually have any information from Google, like maybe a patent application reference, to support the importance of content as it relates to SEO?

Here is what I discovered Google stating about Content.

“Offer quality content and services

Creating compelling and useful content will likely influence your website more than any of the other
factors discussed here. Users know good content when they see it and will likely want to direct other
users to it. This could be through blog posts, social media services, email, forums, or other means.
Organic or word-of-mouth buzz is what helps build your site's reputation with both users and Google,
and it rarely comes without quality content.”

So as I read this excerpt from Google’s SEO Starter Guide Quality content does have an indirect SEO benefit. If you have content worthy of linking too and if people can find your site they just might want to provide you with a useful Do Follow backlink.

Wow, that’s sounds more a mentally challenged like a third cousin than the king of SEO.

What say you?